\n<\/p>\n
Donald Trump says he has cancelled strikes against Iran, provided a deal is struck “rapidly” with the country.<\/b><\/p>\n
In a post on Truth Social, the US president said he had been asked by Iran and other countries in the Middle East to “hold off” on any attack as the “perimeters” of a deal had been agreed. <\/p>\n
Trump’s comments came after reports that the US and Israel may have been planning new, intense strikes on Iran.<\/p>\n
It is not the first time that Trump has issued apocalyptic warnings, only to subsequently insist that diplomacy was being given a chance. Iran has not confimed requesting new talks or any agreement on the outline of a deal to end the war that began with US and Israeli strikes on 28 February.<\/p>\n
On Sunday, Iran’s acting Defence Minister Majid Ibn al-Reza said Tehran viewed every threat from its adversaries as “real and credible” even if it formed part of psychological warfare.<\/p>\n
“We will neither be caught off guard nor remain passive,” he added.<\/p>\n
The raised tones followed reports in the US media that the US and Israel were planning what would be one of the harshest bombing campaigns to date against energy infrastructure targets in Iran. <\/p>\n
The plan came up during Trump’s cabinet meeting on Friday, sources told CBS News, the BBC’s News partner in the US.<\/p>\n
The US government had also urged Americans across the Middle East to be alert and ready to leave “should there be escalation” in the region.<\/p>\n
In his post on Saturday, Trump said the US was “locked and loaded and ready to go against the Islamic Republic of Iran, at levels of Military Terror, Strength, and Power not seen since World War II”.<\/p>\n
He said cancelling the attack would be “for the future benefit of the world and, likewise, the survival of a successful and prosperous Iran”.<\/p>\n
Back on 7 April, the US president warned that “a whole civilisation will die tonight” if Iran refused to engage in peace talks. He threatened to destroy civilian infrastructure and power plants, a move that many said would be a war crime.<\/p>\n
That threat did result in historic face-to-face talks in Pakistan, led by Vice President JD Vance. <\/p>\n
For supporters of the president, it was vindication. Bellicose threats – often referred to as the “Madman Theory” – resulted in talks with the Iranians.<\/p>\n
The issue with that view, however, is that those talks ended without a deal. There were simply too many competing red lines that could not be reconciled, even with the threat of civilisation erasure.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n